Policy Steward:  Vice President for Research, and Corporate Controller


  • Purpose
  • Federal Policy
  • Allowable, Allocable and Reasonable
  • Direct Vs. Indirect (F&A) Costs
  • Further Information
  • Cross References


    All funds must be spent in accordance with Penn State policy, applicable state and federal law, and sponsor terms and conditions.   Only allowable, allocable, and reasonable costs may be charged directly to sponsored agreements.

    Following is an overview of basic costing principles.  All those involved in the administration of sponsored agreements should be familiar with these concepts.


    As a condition of receiving federal grants and contracts, Penn State agrees to follow federal policies, including 2 CFR Part 200 - UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS, also referred to as the Uniform Guidance.   The Uniform Guidance, specifically Subpart E – Cost Principles, provides detailed requirements regarding costs on sponsored awards as well as definitions of direct, indirect, allowable and unallowable costs.   In addition, the Uniform Guidance requires that Universities comply with certain regulations, including Title 48: Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Part 9905 - Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) for Educational Institutions:


    Allowable costs:

    Allowable costs are specifically related to the sponsored agreement, benefit the sponsored agreement in the proportion to the amount charged, and conform to the policies and procedures of Penn State.  The costs must be necessary for the performance of the project.  A particular cost may be allowable on one project, where it is specifically needed for performance, but unallowable on another project where no similar performance requirement exists.

    Detailed factors affecting the allowability of costs are outlined in Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.403.  These factors include:

    It is the purpose of the charge, not necessarily the type of charge that determines its allowability.

    Allocable costs:

    Allocable costs are those that provide direct benefits to the project and can be specifically identified to that project with a high degree of accuracy.

    The detailed criteria to meet the allocability standard are available in the Uniform Guidance - §200.405   Allocable costs.    A cost is allocable to a sponsored agreement if:

    A cost may also be allocable to multiple projects.  It is important that the costs be allocated appropriately across all projects which benefit.  It is not appropriate to charge all of the cost of an item to one sponsored award if it benefits more than one award– each cost needs to be allocated based on how it benefits the various projects.  Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.405-(d)

    Direct cost allocation principles. "If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that can be determined without undue effort or cost, the cost should be allocated to the projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then ... the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on any reasonable documented basis. Where the purchase of equipment or other capital asset is specifically authorized under a Federal award, the costs are assignable to the Federal award regardless of the use that may be made of the equipment or other capital asset involved when no longer needed for the purpose for which it was originally required."

    Some costs may only partially benefit a sponsored award – in such cases, the costs should be allocated to the sponsored award based only on the percentage of benefit derived from that cost item, with the balance of the cost charged to an appropriate non-sponsored account.

    The Uniform Guidance also discusses transfers of costs under the allocability standard:

    Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.405-(c) - Any cost allocable to a particular Federal award under the principles provided for in this part may not be charged to other Federal awards to overcome fund deficiencies, to avoid restrictions imposed by Federal statutes, regulations, or terms and conditions of the Federal awards, or for other reasons. However, this prohibition would not preclude the non-Federal entity from shifting costs that are allowable under two or more Federal awards in accordance with existing Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal awards.

    In other words, costs which are truly allocable to an award may be transferred or shifted if allowable under the award to which it is being transferred, but cost overruns may not be transferred to another federal award.

    Reasonable cost:

    Reasonable costs reflect the actions a prudent person would take at the time the decision was made to incur the costs. Reasonable costs are those that are generally recognized as necessary for the success of the sponsored agreement and are consistent with the sponsor requirements and Penn State policy.

    The detailed considerations to determine reasonableness of a given cost are available in the Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.404 - Reasonable costs.  A cost is considered reasonable if:


    When incurring costs against sponsored awards the PI, with assistance from the administering staff, must ensure only allowable, allocable, and reasonable costs are charged to sponsored agreements. To determine whether a particular cost is allowable, allocable and reasonable, apply the "prudent person" test. If the answer to any of the following questions is "no," then the costs should not be charged to a sponsored award:

    The primary question to ask in making a determination as to whether a particular cost is allowable, allocable and reasonable is:    Does the cost benefit the project?  

    Several documents are available which in most circumstances will provide a measure of confidence as to whether a certain expense is allowable, allocable, and reasonable.


    Direct Costs

    Direct costs are those expenses that are essential to the conduct of sponsored institutional activities and which can be readily attributed and directly charged to specific individual projects. They include expenditures for such items as personnel (salaries and fringe benefits), supplies, equipment, travel and other direct costs necessary for conducting the sponsored activity.  See Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.413 Direct Costs.

    Indirect Costs - Facilities & Administrative Costs (F&A)

    Facilities and administrative (F&A) costs (also referred to as indirect costs or overhead) are those expenses that are essential to the conduct of sponsored institutional activities but which cannot be readily attributed and directly charged to specific individual projects. (See Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.562 CCFR 200.414, and RA30 for further definition and guidance.) 

    Determination of Direct vs.F&A

    Determining if a cost should be included as a direct cost must be done at the proposal stage.  There are certain departmental costs which are included as F&A, and therefore, should not be included as a direct cost.  PIs should work closely with the Research Administrator to ensure that costs normally considered F&A are not included as direct costs in a proposal, unless there is a compelling reason to do so. See RA21 for additional guidance.


    For questions, additional detail, or to request changes to this policy, please contact the Office of the Vice President for Research, or the Office of the Corporate Controller.


    Cost Accounting Standards FAQ

    RA21 – Development of Proposal Budget

    RA30 – Facilities and Administrative Costs

    Effective Date: February 26, 2016
    Date Approved: February 22, 2016
    Date Published: February 26, 2016

    Most recent changes:

    Revision History (and effective dates):

    | top of this policy | GURU policy menu | GURU policy search | GURU home | GURU Tech Support | Privacy and Legal Statement | Penn State website |